If you can't use the truth about Islam as a defense when the Muslim population is 6%, what do you think is going to happen when it is in the double digits-like in France?
The "justice" system is at least being honest about the truth being of no concern or consquence to them, and are happily taking on the role of sharia enforcers in the (currently) secular courts of law.
How long will they be secular courts at this rate?
Then the writer takes the laziest, most idiotic approach to Mr. Wilders: reducto ad Hitlerum.
"I wonder whether he's really read Mein Kampf. Perhaps we've forgotten, perhaps he doesn't realize it himself, but his words and the message of Fitna are exactly – to specific phrases, to the tone of louche brotherliness – what was said about the Jews."
You get it? Geert, he's Hitler, and the Muslims-they are the new Jews! HITLER HITLER HITLER!!
Then there is some tripe about Jews as he tries to make the comparison complete, and then the qualifier: "This is not to say Geert Wilders is a Hitler or his followers are all racists. BUT we shouldn't pretend that his core ideas are in any way reasonable, rational, freedom-loving or tolerant."
This is probably one of the most intellectually lazy articles I have read in the Globe this week!
