February 14, 2012
February 13, 2012
A Must Read From George Jonas
I thought it was a remarkably astute column and urge you to read the whole thing.
It actually triggered a small moment of epiphany for me.
When private citizens are deprived of their right to defend themselves, Jonas is absolutely correct-the police force gets a monopoly on "protection".
For me, the even more troubling part of the equation-and this is something I had not realized until this very moment-relying on any police force for protection makes the citizenry de facto victims every time.
Think about it for a moment.
Police do some kinds of 'preventive' work-they can patrol bad neighbourhoods and be a visible presence. But for the most part, they are reactive and doing post-facto investigative work, and "putting the bad guys away".
This makes the default position of the citizenry victim.
They police can/will only intervene once a crime or possible crime is in action, or post facto.
If you have to dial your phone to get the protection forces, you are already a victim.
The only way to assuredly be the victim is by not responding yourself.
The people who refuse to "wait for police", and defend themselves are grossly over-punished in our nanny state society.
So, the purpose of any given police force cannot really be distilled to "serve" and "protect".
It can therefore more realistically seen as to "respond" and "investigate" and then to use the justice system to incarcerate.
It's actually very sinister if you think about it-the state organ that over-prosecutes people who protect themselves must therefore be seen in the larger context of a state wishing for its citizens to live as potential, or actual victims in perpetuity.
The gun rights movement in the United States is very correct and very clear-and I am with it 100%.
An armed citizenry is one that refuses the passive role in self-protection, and does not surrender individual rights to self-protection to the state.
An armed citizenry refuses to take the de facto position of victim.
This of course, is the ultimate danger to the ever-encroaching, liberal, nanny state.

February 11, 2012
February 10, 2012
Europe is Dead
Now-new 'death at home' vans, making suicide and euthanasia easy, delivered right to your home.
February 09, 2012
Eurabia is Doomed
They must be so proud-to be the first European country that will actually be fully Judenrein in a matter of single years-if not months.
Any bets on which country will next be Judenrein in Europe? I suspect Sweden.
Kathy Gets the Best E-Mail!
Vapors?
Bwhahahahahahhaahaha!
I Am So Bored of HIV/AIDS
So boring. People with HIV are out living a lot of other people. It is so preventable. Bah.
Now, look at all these "celebrities". They mostly look like crap!
Lindsay Lohan looks like a drugged train wreck/dated PrOn star.
Cindy Crawford and Liz Hurley's boobs are really not matching their biological age-the perkiness DOES decline with gravity, darlings, unless they are plastic.
There are so many plastic faces and sucked in cheeks and crease free foreheads here-I thought I had stumbled into a Russian embalming salon advertisement.
Thow Away the Granny Undies
Note: the brunette with the purple bra has a fantastic ass-wow, kudos to her.
February 08, 2012
Doomed!
Behold the ugly, skinny, breastless, vagina-less, European man-fag in a "bandage" bathing suit.
Britain in the Shits
What a pathetic loser society. Similar to Canada in so many ways.
February 06, 2012
"He Ain't A Quitter"
Watch the good news story of the day.
This is one tough, inspiring former Marine.
Adam Gour-Scum of the Earth, Douchebag Supreme
This is perhaps one of the most disgusting individuals in Canada.
I hope he rots.
Making money off of other people's suffering, dying children is one of the most revolting things I have ever seen.
What a pig, and his lawyer is disgusting as well.
Please, if you read this and have a blog, post this story-name and shame this scumbag and hopefully he will never be able to make a dime of the suffering of children again.
Annoying Phrases Liberals Use, Part Eleventy Million and Seventeen
As if my head wasn't throbbing enough this fine sunny February morning, I have been bombarded with a veritable shower of lefty, wanker jargon once again.
Last year, there were two contenders for most annoying. One was "flipping" e-mail to people instead of "sending" them to people. Seriously-is that not so obnoxious? You have to say it with a smarmy tone also "so-can you just FLIP that to so-and-so".
The other thing that made my skin crawl was "landed". That is used instead of a phrase indicating that a decision has been made.
"So, have we 'landed' on a title for that?"
Barf!!!
Lately, there are people who consistently use the phrase "would that make sense" or "does that make sense".
This is used as a genteel way of suggesting either that you are a moron for not having already agreed with their previous, helpful suggestion, or of ordering you to do something but couching it in fuzzy language that they think 'helps' you come to their ("right") conclusion.
The problem is-you cannot actually response "no-that does not make sense" without sounding like, well-LIKE YOU ARE TELLING THE TRUTH.
Monday. Another Monday.